Broken/NS106:Evaluation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{| cellspacing="5" | {| cellspacing="5" | ||
|- | |- | ||
!align="right" |'''Importance | !align="right" |'''Page Importance:''' | ||
|<small>How well does this Case Study illustrate the power of CC licensing? How compelling or novel is this use case? [[Case Studies/Evaluation#Importance|See more detailed criteria]].</small> | |<small>How well does this Case Study illustrate the power of CC licensing? How compelling or novel is this use case? [[Case Studies/Evaluation#Importance|See more detailed criteria]].</small> | ||
|- style="height:30px;" valign="top" | |- style="height:30px;" valign="top" | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|{{{field|importance|input type=dropdown|values=High,Medium,Low}}} | |{{{field|importance|input type=dropdown|values=High,Medium,Low}}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
!align="right" |'''Quality:''' | !align="right" |'''Page Quality:''' | ||
|<small>How well is this Case Study explained and documented? [[Case Studies/Evaluation#Quality|See more detailed criteria]].</small> | |<small>How well is this Case Study explained and documented? [[Case Studies/Evaluation#Quality|See more detailed criteria]].</small> | ||
|- style="height:30px;" valign="top" | |- style="height:30px;" valign="top" | ||
Revision as of 00:26, 25 August 2010