Jump to content

Government use of Creative Commons: Difference between revisions

From CC Public Wiki
Line 16: Line 16:


'''Australian government reports recommending CC usage'''
'''Australian government reports recommending CC usage'''
* [http://www.qsic.qld.gov.au/QSIC/QSIC.nsf/CPByUNID/BFDC06236FADB6814A25727B0013C7EE Government Information and Licensing Framework] - a Queensland Government strategy on open access and use of information  
* [http://www.gilf.gov.au Government Information and Licensing Framework] - a Queensland Government strategy on open access and use of information  
* [http://www.innovation.gov.au/innovationreview/Pages/home.aspx Venturous Australia: the National Innovation Review] - report recommends government use of CC licences, and is released under CC  
* [http://www.innovation.gov.au/innovationreview/Pages/home.aspx Venturous Australia: the National Innovation Review] - report recommends government use of CC licences, and is released under CC  
* [http://creativecommons.org.au/node/250 Victorian Government's Economic Development Committee] recommends CC licensing for public sector information.
* [http://creativecommons.org.au/node/250 Victorian Government's Economic Development Committee] recommends CC licensing for public sector information.

Revision as of 05:41, 21 July 2009

Currently this is a scratchpad for referencing known government uses of CC licensing (and government recommendations of CC licensing). Please add to the list and turn compelling uses into Case_Studies.

Armenia

Australia

Australian government reports recommending CC usage

Bulgaria

Colombia

Mexico

Netherlands

New Zealand

OECD

Russian Federation

Spain

United States