Jump to content

Rewrite Metadata Validator: Difference between revisions

From CC Public Wiki
No edit summary
Hdworak (talk | contribs)
Work in progress (Google Summer of Code™ 2008)
Line 5: Line 5:
|is_complete=no
|is_complete=no
}}
}}
{{Infobox|'''Work in progress'''
A proposal based on this idea has been accepted for [http://code.google.com/soc/2008/ Google Summer of Code™ 2008] and the project is currently a work in progress. Read more about it on its [[Rewrite Metadata Validator/SoC 2008|dedicated page]].}}
Creative Commons historically ran a [http://validator.creativecommons.org metadata validator] (also developed in response to a challenge) which allowed users to verify they had made the correct assertions about their work.  Since moving to [[RDFa]], the validator has become less relevant and is in need of a major overhaul (perhaps even rewrite).   
Creative Commons historically ran a [http://validator.creativecommons.org metadata validator] (also developed in response to a challenge) which allowed users to verify they had made the correct assertions about their work.  Since moving to [[RDFa]], the validator has become less relevant and is in need of a major overhaul (perhaps even rewrite).   



Revision as of 22:03, 26 May 2008

Related To: ,|x|Related To::x}}
Tags: {{#arraymap:gsoc, metadata|,|x|Has Tag::x}} | (none) }}
Challenge Type: Has Challenge Type::Developer | (none) }}
Is Complete: Is Complete::no | Is Complete::no }}


Work in progress

A proposal based on this idea has been accepted for Google Summer of Code™ 2008 and the project is currently a work in progress. Read more about it on its dedicated page.

Creative Commons historically ran a metadata validator (also developed in response to a challenge) which allowed users to verify they had made the correct assertions about their work. Since moving to RDFa, the validator has become less relevant and is in need of a major overhaul (perhaps even rewrite).

A minimal implementation will:

  • support all recommended methods, historical and current, of embedding CC license information in a web page (see the file format page for more information)
  • alert users that embedding using historical methods has been deprecated
  • support making assertions about embedded objects

An awesome implementation will:

  • support validating CC license inclusion in non-HTML formats (ie, Syndication feeds), auto-detecting the validation suite to use basic on returned content-type and allowing users to override if necessary
  • traverse special links (ie, cc:morePermissions, cc:attributionURL, xmpRights:WebStatement) looking for additional metadata to provide a complete picture of the published metadata.