Case Studies: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
=== project name === | === project name === | ||
*project name | |||
=== website === | |||
*URL | |||
=== tagline === | |||
*tagline, abbreviated description, etc. | |||
=== cc license === | |||
*if has many, list all different ones? | |||
=== author(s)/collaborators === | === author(s)/collaborators === | ||
| Line 44: | Line 54: | ||
*description of the project | *description of the project | ||
=== license usage === | === license usage === | ||
Revision as of 15:32, 12 February 2008
This is the home of the CC Use Cases project that looks at building clear high-level use cases of Creative Commons internationally. The project is initiated along with Creative Commons Australia. Our goal is to create a community-powered system for qualitatively measuring the impact of Creative Commons around the world.
The best place to communicate on this is through the cc-community mailing list and the #cc chat channel on irc.freenode.net. Join in the fun!
Fields recommended for SMW -- from Asia and the Commons Booklet
project name
- project name
website
- URL
tagline
- tagline, abbreviated description, etc.
cc license
- if has many, list all different ones?
author(s)/collaborators
media type
- animation
- article
- audio
- book
- design
- educational resource
- event/performance
- film
- graphic design
- image
- interactive media
- photography
- podcast
- software
- sound
- text
- video
- visual art
- writing
location
- asia and the commons uses country, sometimes multiple
- could include city? cc jurisdiction?
- should be able to support multiple locations
summary/overview
- description of the project
license usage
- discussion around licensing choice
- also discusses CC+ options on a few of the projects
- could possibly be merged with motivations?
motivations
- these are usually interviews with creators into why they're using creative commons for their project
- what creative commons provides for them