Broken/NS106:Evaluation: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <noinclude></noinclude>
 <includeonly>{{{info|partial form}}}{{{for template|Case Study}}}
-{| cellspacing="0"
+{| cellspacing="5"
-|-valign="top"
+|-
-!align="right" |'''Your username:'''
+!align="right" |'''Page Importance:'''
-|{{{field|last reviewer|size=30|mandatory}}}
+|<small>How well does this Case Study illustrate the power of CC licensing? How compelling or novel is this use case? [[Case_Studies/Evaluation#Importance_as_a_Case_Study|See more detailed criteria]].</small>
 |- style="height:30px;" valign="top"
 |
-|<small>Enter your username without the "User:" prefix.</small>
+|{{{field|importance|input type=dropdown|values=High,Medium,Low}}}
-|- valign="top"
+|-
-!align="right" |'''Importance:'''<br />
+!align="right" |'''Page Quality:'''
-|{{{field|importance|input type=dropdown|values=Low,Medium,High}}}
+|<small>How well is this Case Study explained and documented? [[Case Studies/Evaluation#Quality|See more detailed criteria]].</small>
-|- style="height:30px;" valign="top"
-|
-|<small>How well does this Case Study illustrate the power of CC licensing? How compelling or novel is this use case?</small><br />
-|- valign="top"
-!align="right" |'''Quality:'''
-|{{{field|quality|input type=dropdown|values=Low,Medium,High}}}
 |- style="height:30px;" valign="top"
 |
-|<small>How well is this Case Study explained and documented?</small>
+|{{{field|quality|input type=dropdown|values=A-Class,B-Class,C-Class,Start,Stub}}}
-|- valign="top"
-!align="right" |'''Review Status:'''
-|{{{field|review status|input type=dropdown|values=Needs review,Partially reviewed,Fully reviewed|default=Needs review}}}
 |}
 {{{end template}}}

Latest revision as of 17:30, 30 August 2010