Jump to content

Talk:Defining Noncommercial: Difference between revisions

From CC Public Wiki
Spam: Undo revision 96260 by VikArggo (talk)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
* Stephen Downes, http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50061
* Stephen Downes, http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50061
* Glyn Moody, http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2009/09/nonplussed-by-non-commercial.html
* Glyn Moody, http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2009/09/nonplussed-by-non-commercial.html
* John Weitzmann, http://www.netzpolitik.org/2009/cc-studie-zu-noncommercial-abgeschlossen/
* John Weitzmann, http://www.netzpolitik.org/2009/cc-studie-zu-noncommercial-abgeschlossen/ (German)
* Raizel Liebler, http://thelearnedfangirl.com/2009/09/24/commercial-versus-non-commercial-use/
* Martin Wisniowski, http://www.gulli.com/news/creative-commons-studie-was-2009-10-03/ (German)
* http://www.ip-notiz.de/nc-zusammenfassung-der-creative-commons-studie/2009/10/01/ (German)
* Molly Kleinman, http://mollykleinman.com/2009/09/30/defining-noncommercial-use-study-published-by-cc/
* Andres Guadamuz, http://www.technollama.co.uk/how-to-use-non-commercial-content-commercially
* Greg Grossmeier, http://publishing.umich.edu/2011/04/13/mlibrary-creative-commons/
* http://www.niemanlab.org/2011/11/wired-releases-images-via-creative-commons-but-reopens-a-debate-on-what-noncommercial-means/

Latest revision as of 10:58, 29 November 2013

This is one place to leave feedback on the study.

Blogged reactions

For now, using this talk section to track blogged reactions. Please add to the list. --Mike Linksvayer 17:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)