Liblicense 04 release todo - Revision history

Scott Shawcroft at 20:58, 22 August 2007

2007-08-22T20:58:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:58, 22 August 2007
Line 26:		Line 26:
	* package (liblicense, liblicense-kde, and liblicense-gnome)		* package (liblicense, liblicense-kde, and liblicense-gnome)
	** <del>source</del> [https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=80503&package_id=238700&release_id=533852 sf]		** <del>source</del> [https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=80503&package_id=238700&release_id=533852 sf]
	** rpm		** <del>rpm</del>
	** deb		** deb
	** ebuilds (bugs 187196, 185689, and 78021 in gentoo's bugzilla)		** ebuilds (bugs 187196, 185689, and 78021 in gentoo's bugzilla)
Line 41:		Line 41:

	* publicity		* publicity
	** freshmeat		** <del>freshmeat</del>
	** sourceforge		** <del>sourceforge</del>
	** CC techblog (scott's wrap-up)		** CC techblog (scott's wrap-up)

Scott Shawcroft at 23:49, 21 August 2007

2007-08-21T23:49:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:49, 21 August 2007
Line 22:		Line 22:
	*** We've broken it up into liblicense{,-kde,-gnome}		*** We've broken it up into liblicense{,-kde,-gnome}

	* tag svn		* <del>tag svn</del>

	* package (liblicense, liblicense-kde, and liblicense-gnome)		* package (liblicense, liblicense-kde, and liblicense-gnome)
	** source		** <del>source</del> [https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=80503&package_id=238700&release_id=533852 sf]
	** rpm		** rpm
	** deb		** deb
	** ebuilds (bugs 187196, 185689, and 78021 in gentoo's bugzilla)		** ebuilds (bugs 187196, 185689, and 78021 in gentoo's bugzilla)
	** test them!
	** Core dependencies:		* Core dependencies:
	*** libraptor		** libraptor
	*** exempi		** exempi
	** GNOME Integration dependencies:		* GNOME Integration dependencies:
	*** liblicense python bindings		** liblicense python bindings
	*** nautilus-python		** nautilus-python
	*** gnome-python		** gnome-python
	** KDE4 Integration dependencies:		* KDE4 Integration dependencies:
	*** kdelibs4 (tested on alpha2 and beta1)		** kdelibs4 (tested on alpha2 and beta1)

	* publicity		* publicity
	** freshmeat		** freshmeat
	** sourceforge		** sourceforge
	** ?		** CC techblog (scott's wrap-up)

	== Asheesh's comments ==		== Asheesh's comments ==

Scott Shawcroft at 21:17, 20 August 2007

2007-08-20T21:17:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 20 August 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	*** I found [http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-toolchain/1998/07/17/0000.html one explanation] of it while Googling		*** I found [http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-toolchain/1998/07/17/0000.html one explanation] of it while Googling
	*** Jakin: I think this is a premature concern; once things stabilize I think this is a good idea. At version 0.3, people should expect that source and binary compatibility isn't guaranteed.		*** Jakin: I think this is a premature concern; once things stabilize I think this is a good idea. At version 0.3, people should expect that source and binary compatibility isn't guaranteed.
	** not clear what default-content-license does, exactly- maybe replace 'Default Content License' with 'choose the default license for new content you create' or something like that? (whatever is accurate :)		** <del>not clear what default-content-license does, exactly- maybe replace 'Default Content License' with 'choose the default license for new content you create' or something like that? (whatever is accurate :) </del>
	** <del>I'd get rid of the frame around the license chooser. Not used by most gnome apps.</del>		** <del>I'd get rid of the frame around the license chooser. Not used by most gnome apps.</del>
	** <del>URI: what goes there? I assume the license URI, but I'd expect the license chooser would set that, and it doesn't appear to.</del> (Changed to license URI. If license chooser doesn't set this field, then we've still got a problem)		** <del>URI: what goes there? I assume the license URI, but I'd expect the license chooser would set that, and it doesn't appear to.</del> (Changed to license URI. If license chooser doesn't set this field, then we've still got a problem)
Line 50:		Line 50:
	* <del>Also, default-content-license seems to allow you to check boxes to create combinations where no license exists. That's quite odd.</del>		* <del>Also, default-content-license seems to allow you to check boxes to create combinations where no license exists. That's quite odd.</del>
	** jakin: I don't mind. In a general sense, those combinations could exist in the future. This license selector is not CC specific.		** jakin: I don't mind. In a general sense, those combinations could exist in the future. This license selector is not CC specific.
	* How do I unset the default license on my desktop? I ran it once, and it seemed to automatically save, and but I don't want to have set a default license.		* <del>How do I unset the default license on my desktop? I ran it once, and it seemed to automatically save, and but I don't want to have set a default license.</del>
	* <del>UI is way confusing, dudes</del>		* <del>UI is way confusing, dudes</del>

Scott Shawcroft: /* default-content-license */

2007-08-17T23:12:00Z

default-content-license

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:12, 17 August 2007
Line 48:		Line 48:
	=== default-content-license ===		=== default-content-license ===
	* <del>In "Creative Commons - Attribution-NoDerivs - 3.0.0", 3.0.0 really should be 3.0</del> (API allows for arbitrary version divisions)		* <del>In "Creative Commons - Attribution-NoDerivs - 3.0.0", 3.0.0 really should be 3.0</del> (API allows for arbitrary version divisions)
	* Also, default-content-license seems to allow you to check boxes to create combinations where no license exists. That's quite odd.		* <del>Also, default-content-license seems to allow you to check boxes to create combinations where no license exists. That's quite odd.</del>
	** jakin: I don't mind. In a general sense, those combinations could exist in the future. This license selector is not CC specific.		** jakin: I don't mind. In a general sense, those combinations could exist in the future. This license selector is not CC specific.
	* How do I unset the default license on my desktop? I ran it once, and it seemed to automatically save, and but I don't want to have set a default license.		* How do I unset the default license on my desktop? I ran it once, and it seemed to automatically save, and but I don't want to have set a default license.

Scott Shawcroft at 21:17, 17 August 2007

2007-08-17T21:17:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 17 August 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	*** <del>system settings module</del>		*** <del>system settings module</del>
	*** <del>file properties license tab</del>		*** <del>file properties license tab</del>
	** OLPC integration		** <del>OLPC integration</del> (nearly done but will be external of ll releases)
	*** Journal integration		*** <del>Journal integration</del>
	** GUI i18n (liblicense core already handled)		** <del>GUI i18n (liblicense core already handled)</del>
	** <del>Expand liblicense API to allow dynamically populating the jurisdiction selector</del>		** <del>Expand liblicense API to allow dynamically populating the jurisdiction selector</del>
	** <del>Automated regression testing, especially for io modules. We need to be absolutely certain that data won't be lost</del>		** <del>Automated regression testing, especially for io modules. We need to be absolutely certain that data won't be lost</del>

Scott Shawcroft at 21:15, 17 August 2007

2007-08-17T21:15:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 17 August 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:
	** GUI i18n (liblicense core already handled)		** GUI i18n (liblicense core already handled)
	** <del>Expand liblicense API to allow dynamically populating the jurisdiction selector</del>		** <del>Expand liblicense API to allow dynamically populating the jurisdiction selector</del>
	** Automated regression testing, especially for io modules. We need to be absolutely certain that data won't be lost		** <del>Automated regression testing, especially for io modules. We need to be absolutely certain that data won't be lost</del>
	** ODF support (jakin) :) Solve the problem for the world and get all the fame and glory!		** <del>ODF support (jakin) :) Solve the problem for the world and get all the fame and glory!</del>
	* bugs/issues		* bugs/issues
	** <del>License chooser api ironing out (http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-devel/2007-July/000539.html). I could wrap the flags to hide the bit-shifting -- but before I do that, I want feedback as to whether this design, in general, works.</del>		** <del>License chooser api ironing out (http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-devel/2007-July/000539.html). I could wrap the flags to hide the bit-shifting -- but before I do that, I want feedback as to whether this design, in general, works.</del>

Scott Shawcroft: /* default-content-license */

2007-08-16T23:37:59Z

default-content-license

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:37, 16 August 2007
Line 51:		Line 51:
	** jakin: I don't mind. In a general sense, those combinations could exist in the future. This license selector is not CC specific.		** jakin: I don't mind. In a general sense, those combinations could exist in the future. This license selector is not CC specific.
	* How do I unset the default license on my desktop? I ran it once, and it seemed to automatically save, and but I don't want to have set a default license.		* How do I unset the default license on my desktop? I ran it once, and it seemed to automatically save, and but I don't want to have set a default license.
	* UI is way confusing, dudes		* <del>UI is way confusing, dudes</del>

	=== /usr/bin/license ===		=== /usr/bin/license ===

Jason Kivlighn at 23:21, 16 August 2007

2007-08-16T23:21:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:21, 16 August 2007
Line 34:		Line 34:
	*** exempi		*** exempi
	** GNOME Integration dependencies:		** GNOME Integration dependencies:
			*** liblicense python bindings
	*** nautilus-python		*** nautilus-python
	*** gnome-python		*** gnome-python

Jon Phillips at 23:16, 16 August 2007

2007-08-16T23:16:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:16, 16 August 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	** <del>Expand liblicense API to allow dynamically populating the jurisdiction selector</del>		** <del>Expand liblicense API to allow dynamically populating the jurisdiction selector</del>
	** Automated regression testing, especially for io modules. We need to be absolutely certain that data won't be lost		** Automated regression testing, especially for io modules. We need to be absolutely certain that data won't be lost
			** ODF support (jakin) :) Solve the problem for the world and get all the fame and glory!
	* bugs/issues		* bugs/issues
	** <del>License chooser api ironing out (http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-devel/2007-July/000539.html). I could wrap the flags to hide the bit-shifting -- but before I do that, I want feedback as to whether this design, in general, works.</del>		** <del>License chooser api ironing out (http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-devel/2007-July/000539.html). I could wrap the flags to hide the bit-shifting -- but before I do that, I want feedback as to whether this design, in general, works.</del>

Jason Kivlighn at 22:58, 16 August 2007

2007-08-16T22:58:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:58, 16 August 2007
Line 37:		Line 37:
	*** gnome-python		*** gnome-python
	** KDE4 Integration dependencies:		** KDE4 Integration dependencies:
	*** kdelibs4		*** kdelibs4 (tested on alpha2 and beta1)

	* publicity		* publicity