Funding Course - Revision history

Jonas Öberg: /* Timeline */

2011-03-11T14:10:28Z

Timeline

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 11 March 2011
Line 17:		Line 17:
	=== Timeline ===		=== Timeline ===

	* Week 1: ~~Introductions and initial round of ideas from participants. Every participant puts at least three different ideas on the table for what they would like to work with. Peer and teacher comments~~.		The timeline is now available over on P2PU: http://p2pu.org/general/getting-your-cc-project-funded/document/schedule
	* Week 2: Participants decide on which project ~~to focus on individually. Workshop 1 & 2. Start of individual help to find a funding partner for the projects.~~
	* Week 3: Workshop 3 & 4
	* Week 4: Workshop 5
	* Week 5: Workshop 6 and first round of expert review (carries into week 6)
	* Week 6: Finishing of the first round of expert reviews
	* Week 7: Peer review 1 where students exchange proposals and review each other
	* Week 8: Peer review 2
	* Week 9: Second and last expert review
	* Week 10: Finishing the course and submitting (if relevant) proposals to funding bodies

	== Expert reviewers ==		== Expert reviewers ==

CCID-jane: /* Expert reviewers */

2011-02-23T18:59:25Z

Expert reviewers

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 23 February 2011
Line 31:		Line 31:
	The course will engage two expert reviewers with experience from both reviewing and writing project proposals. We are continuously seeking additional reviewers with experience, who can contribute to this process, and form a team of reviewers not only for this course but for future courses or CC projects.		The course will engage two expert reviewers with experience from both reviewing and writing project proposals. We are continuously seeking additional reviewers with experience, who can contribute to this process, and form a team of reviewers not only for this course but for future courses or CC projects.

	*'''Jonas Öberg''', languages: Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, English. Jonas has worked as a reviewer for the European Commission, as well as authored and co-authored numerous proposals for the European		*'''Jonas Öberg''', languages: Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, English. Jonas has worked as a reviewer for the European Commission, as well as authored and co-authored numerous proposals for the European Commission and several Nordic cultural foundations.
	Commission and several Nordic cultural foundations.

	*'''Julia Velkova''', languages: Spanish, Russian, Bulgarian, English. Julia has worked with and authored projects for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Open Society Institute, European Commission and Internet Society in her work for the Internet Society Bulgaria.		*'''Julia Velkova''', languages: Spanish, Russian, Bulgarian, English. Julia has worked with and authored projects for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Open Society Institute, European Commission and Internet Society in her work for the Internet Society Bulgaria.

CCID-jane: /* Expert reviewers */

2011-02-23T18:59:15Z

Expert reviewers

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 23 February 2011
Line 31:		Line 31:
	The course will engage two expert reviewers with experience from both reviewing and writing project proposals. We are continuously seeking additional reviewers with experience, who can contribute to this process, and form a team of reviewers not only for this course but for future courses or CC projects.		The course will engage two expert reviewers with experience from both reviewing and writing project proposals. We are continuously seeking additional reviewers with experience, who can contribute to this process, and form a team of reviewers not only for this course but for future courses or CC projects.

	* '''Jonas Öberg''', languages: Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, English.		*'''Jonas Öberg''', languages: Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, English. Jonas has worked as a reviewer for the European Commission, as well as authored and co-authored numerous proposals for the European
	:Jonas has worked as a reviewer for the European Commission, as
	well as authored and co-authored numerous proposals for the European
	Commission and several Nordic cultural foundations.		Commission and several Nordic cultural foundations.

	* '''Julia Velkova''', languages: Spanish, Russian, Bulgarian, English		*'''Julia Velkova''', languages: Spanish, Russian, Bulgarian, English. Julia has worked with and authored projects for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Open Society Institute, European Commission and Internet Society in her work for the Internet Society Bulgaria.
	:Julia has worked with and authored projects for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Open Society Institute, European Commission and Internet Society in her work for the Internet Society Bulgaria.

CCID-jane: /* Expert reviewers */

2011-02-23T18:58:28Z

Expert reviewers

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:58, 23 February 2011
Line 31:		Line 31:
	The course will engage two expert reviewers with experience from both reviewing and writing project proposals. We are continuously seeking additional reviewers with experience, who can contribute to this process, and form a team of reviewers not only for this course but for future courses or CC projects.		The course will engage two expert reviewers with experience from both reviewing and writing project proposals. We are continuously seeking additional reviewers with experience, who can contribute to this process, and form a team of reviewers not only for this course but for future courses or CC projects.

	* Jonas Öberg, languages: Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, English		* '''Jonas Öberg''', languages: Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, English.
	* Julia Velkova, languages: Spanish, Russian, Bulgarian, English		:Jonas has worked as a reviewer for the European Commission, as
			well as authored and co-authored numerous proposals for the European
			Commission and several Nordic cultural foundations.

			* '''Julia Velkova''', languages: Spanish, Russian, Bulgarian, English
			:Julia has worked with and authored projects for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Open Society Institute, European Commission and Internet Society in her work for the Internet Society Bulgaria.

Jonas Öberg at 14:54, 17 February 2011

2011-02-17T14:54:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:54, 17 February 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This page is for the [http://p2pu.org/general/getting-your-cc-project-funded Getting your CC Project Funded] course which runs at P2PU during ~~sprint~~ 2011.		This page is for the [http://p2pu.org/general/getting-your-cc-project-funded Getting your CC Project Funded] course which runs at P2PU during spring 2011.

Jonas Öberg at 14:54, 17 February 2011

2011-02-17T14:54:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:54, 17 February 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This page is for the ~~<a href="~~http://p2pu.org/general/getting-your-cc-project-funded">Getting your CC Project Funded~~</a>~~ course which runs at P2PU during sprint 2011.		This page is for the [http://p2pu.org/general/getting-your-cc-project-funded Getting your CC Project Funded] course which runs at P2PU during sprint 2011.

Jonas Öberg: Created page with "This page is for the Getting your CC Project Funded course which runs at P2PU during sprint 2011. == Overvi..."

2011-02-17T14:53:53Z

Created page with "This page is for the <a href="http://p2pu.org/general/getting-your-cc-project-funded">Getting your CC Project Funded</a> course which runs at P2PU during sprint 2011. == Overvi..."

New page

This page is for the <a href="http://p2pu.org/general/getting-your-cc-project-funded">Getting your CC Project Funded</a> course which runs at P2PU during sprint 2011.

== Overview ==
This course is meant for those who are working on finding funding for Creative Commons projects. During the course, through a series of workshops and seminars, you will be taken through the steps from an initial idea to having a finished project proposal that can be submitted. You provide the idea -- we provide the guidance to turn this into a proposal that can't be refused.

In total, six workshops on different areas of a project proposal are planned for the first five weeks of the course. After this, there will be a series of expert and peer reviews of your proposals. By the end of the 10th week of the course, you will have received a final review of your project proposal by an experienced reviewer. Based on the comments received from that and previous peer and expert reviews you can then proceed to submit your proposal to a finding body and hope that they will think your project as good as we do!

=== Workshops ===
* Workshop 1: ''How do we move from having an '''idea''' to realizing those ideas in terms of having '''aims''', and '''goals'''?''
* Workshop 2: ''Which funding bodies are there that can give financial support, and how do we find appropriate sponsors for our project?''
* Workshop 3: ''How can we structure our proposed work in terms of '''tasks''' and how do we make a realistic '''timeline'''?''
* Workshop 4: ''Knowing how long '''time''' we estimate, and the '''resources''' we need, how do we put together a reasonable '''budget'''?''
* Workshop 5: ''What happens after the funding period is over? How do we make the project '''sustainable'''?''
* Workshop 6: ''What would we look at when '''reviewing''' another proposal?''

=== Timeline ===

* Week 1: Introductions and initial round of ideas from participants. Every participant puts at least three different ideas on the table for what they would like to work with. Peer and teacher comments.
* Week 2: Participants decide on which project to focus on individually. Workshop 1 & 2. Start of individual help to find a funding partner for the projects.
* Week 3: Workshop 3 & 4
* Week 4: Workshop 5
* Week 5: Workshop 6 and first round of expert review (carries into week 6)
* Week 6: Finishing of the first round of expert reviews
* Week 7: Peer review 1 where students exchange proposals and review each other
* Week 8: Peer review 2
* Week 9: Second and last expert review
* Week 10: Finishing the course and submitting (if relevant) proposals to funding bodies

== Expert reviewers ==
The course will engage two expert reviewers with experience from both reviewing and writing project proposals. We are continuously seeking additional reviewers with experience, who can contribute to this process, and form a team of reviewers not only for this course but for future courses or CC projects.

* Jonas Öberg, languages: Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, English
* Julia Velkova, languages: Spanish, Russian, Bulgarian, English