4.0/Attribution and marking - Revision history

CCID-shinchpearson at 01:29, 14 March 2014

2014-03-14T01:29:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:29, 14 March 2014
Line 59:		Line 59:
	The attribution and marking requirements in draft 4 align closely with those in Version 3.0. For a detailed comparison against version 3, see this [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/images/3/32/Attribution_chart_%28v3_v_d4%29_.pdf chart].		The attribution and marking requirements in draft 4 align closely with those in Version 3.0. For a detailed comparison against version 3, see this [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/images/3/32/Attribution_chart_%28v3_v_d4%29_.pdf chart].

	Comparison to d3: The requirement to retain a URI to the licensed material if it is supplied by the licensor now applies even where the material is used without modifications. We heard from many current and potential adopters that this requirement, which now mirrors Version 3.0, is important for provenance, branding, and other reasons. The requirement to indicate if you modify the material remains, but it is no longer tied to the URI requirement. We also added a requirement to retain an indication of prior modifications, so that important information about the source of a work (e.g., that a film is based on a novel) is retained. For inter-version compatibility purposes, we reverted to the Version 3.0 requirement to retain a notice about the disclaimer of warranties, but removed an obligation to retain a customized disclaimer (since those are no longer considered part of the license when offered -- see the explanation on the [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0/Disclaimer_of_warranties_and_related_issues#Draft_4 Disclaimers and warranties wiki page]). One other substantive change is to make it clear that supplying the name of the author and attribution parties is only required if they are supplied by the licensor. We made a few other language and formatting changes to make the requirements as simple to understand as possible.		Comparison to d3: The requirement to retain a URI to the licensed material if it is supplied by the licensor now applies even where the material is used without modifications. We heard from many current and potential adopters that this requirement, which now mirrors Version 3.0, is important for provenance, branding, and other reasons. The requirement to indicate if you modify the material remains, but it is no longer tied to the URI requirement. We also added a requirement to retain an indication of prior modifications, so that important information about the source of a work (e.g., that a film is based on a novel) is retained. For inter-version compatibility purposes, we reverted to the Version 3.0 requirement to retain a notice about the disclaimer of warranties, but removed an obligation to retain a customized disclaimer (since those are no longer considered part of the license when offered -- see the explanation on the [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0/Disclaimer_of_warranties_and_related_issues#Draft_4 Disclaimers and warranties wiki page]). One other substantive change is to make it clear that supplying the name of the author and attribution parties is only required if they are supplied by the licensor. We made a few other language and formatting changes to make the requirements as simple to understand as possible. We also altered the numbering scheme to ensure that the attribution provisions that are in all six licenses would have the same section numbers throughout the license suite.

	}}		}}

CCID-shinchpearson at 21:59, 19 December 2013

2013-12-19T21:59:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:59, 19 December 2013
Line 82:		Line 82:
	:: ''If You create an Adaptation, upon notice from any Licensor You must, to the extent practicable, remove from the Adaptation any credit as required by Section 4(__), as requested.'' <ref>See Section 4(a) of the licenses that permit adaptations.</ref>		:: ''If You create an Adaptation, upon notice from any Licensor You must, to the extent practicable, remove from the Adaptation any credit as required by Section 4(__), as requested.'' <ref>See Section 4(a) of the licenses that permit adaptations.</ref>

	The attribution requirement is reflected on the ~~[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/~~ CC deeds] as:		The attribution requirement was reflected on the CC deeds as:

	:: ''Attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).''		:: ''Attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).''

CCID-shinchpearson at 22:46, 11 September 2013

2013-09-11T22:46:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:46, 11 September 2013
Line 57:		Line 57:
	{{Infobox\|		{{Infobox\|
	===Draft 4===		===Draft 4===
	The requirement to retain a URI to the licensed material if it is supplied by the licensor now applies even where the material is used without modifications. We heard from many current and potential adopters that this requirement, which now mirrors Version 3.0, is important for provenance, branding, and other reasons. The requirement to indicate if you modify the material remains, but it is no longer tied to the URI requirement. We also added a requirement to retain an indication of prior modifications, so that important information about the source of a work (e.g., that a film is based on a novel) is retained. For inter-version compatibility purposes, we reverted to the Version 3.0 requirement to retain a notice about the disclaimer of warranties, but removed an obligation to retain a customized disclaimer (since those are no longer considered part of the license when offered -- see the explanation on the [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0/Disclaimer_of_warranties_and_related_issues#Draft_4 Disclaimers and warranties wiki page]). One other substantive change is to make it clear that supplying the name of the author and attribution parties is only required if they are supplied by the licensor. We made a few other language and formatting changes to make the requirements as simple to understand as possible.		The attribution and marking requirements in draft 4 align closely with those in Version 3.0. For a detailed comparison against version 3, see this [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/images/3/32/Attribution_chart_%28v3_v_d4%29_.pdf chart].

			Comparison to d3: The requirement to retain a URI to the licensed material if it is supplied by the licensor now applies even where the material is used without modifications. We heard from many current and potential adopters that this requirement, which now mirrors Version 3.0, is important for provenance, branding, and other reasons. The requirement to indicate if you modify the material remains, but it is no longer tied to the URI requirement. We also added a requirement to retain an indication of prior modifications, so that important information about the source of a work (e.g., that a film is based on a novel) is retained. For inter-version compatibility purposes, we reverted to the Version 3.0 requirement to retain a notice about the disclaimer of warranties, but removed an obligation to retain a customized disclaimer (since those are no longer considered part of the license when offered -- see the explanation on the [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0/Disclaimer_of_warranties_and_related_issues#Draft_4 Disclaimers and warranties wiki page]). One other substantive change is to make it clear that supplying the name of the author and attribution parties is only required if they are supplied by the licensor. We made a few other language and formatting changes to make the requirements as simple to understand as possible.

	}}		}}

CCID-diane peters at 19:08, 11 September 2013

2013-09-11T19:08:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:08, 11 September 2013
Line 57:		Line 57:
	{{Infobox\|		{{Infobox\|
	===Draft 4===		===Draft 4===
	The requirement to retain a URI to the licensed material if it is supplied by the licensor now applies even where the material is used without modifications. We heard from many current and potential adopters that this requirement, which now mirrors Version 3.0, is important for provenance, branding, and other reasons. The requirement to indicate if you modify the material remains, but it is no longer tied to the URI requirement. We also added a requirement to retain an indication of prior modifications, so that important information about the source of a work (e.g., that a film is based on a novel) is retained. For inter-version compatibility purposes, we reverted to the Version 3.0 requirement to retain a notice about the disclaimer of warranties, but removed an obligation to retain a customized disclaimer (since those are no longer considered part of the license when offered, see ~~LINK~~). One other substantive change is to make it clear that supplying the name of the author and attribution parties is only required if they are supplied by the licensor. We made a few other language and formatting changes to make the requirements as simple to understand as possible.		The requirement to retain a URI to the licensed material if it is supplied by the licensor now applies even where the material is used without modifications. We heard from many current and potential adopters that this requirement, which now mirrors Version 3.0, is important for provenance, branding, and other reasons. The requirement to indicate if you modify the material remains, but it is no longer tied to the URI requirement. We also added a requirement to retain an indication of prior modifications, so that important information about the source of a work (e.g., that a film is based on a novel) is retained. For inter-version compatibility purposes, we reverted to the Version 3.0 requirement to retain a notice about the disclaimer of warranties, but removed an obligation to retain a customized disclaimer (since those are no longer considered part of the license when offered -- see the explanation on the [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0/Disclaimer_of_warranties_and_related_issues#Draft_4 Disclaimers and warranties wiki page]). One other substantive change is to make it clear that supplying the name of the author and attribution parties is only required if they are supplied by the licensor. We made a few other language and formatting changes to make the requirements as simple to understand as possible.

	}}		}}

CCID-diane peters at 19:02, 11 September 2013

2013-09-11T19:02:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 11 September 2013
Line 57:		Line 57:
	{{Infobox\|		{{Infobox\|
	===Draft 4===		===Draft 4===
	The requirement to retain a URI to the licensed material if it is supplied by the licensor now applies even where the material is used ~~as-is~~. We heard from many current and potential adopters that this requirement, which now mirrors Version 3.0, is important for provenance, branding, and other reasons. The requirement to indicate if you modify the material remains, but it is no longer tied to the URI requirement. We also added a requirement to retain an indication of prior modifications, so that important information about the source of a work (e.g., that a film is based on a novel) is retained. For inter-version compatibility purposes, we reverted to the Version 3.0 requirement to retain a notice about the disclaimer of warranties. One other substantive change ~~was~~ to make it clear that the author and attribution parties ~~are~~ only required if they are supplied by the licensor. We made a few other language and formatting changes to make the requirements as simple to understand as possible.		The requirement to retain a URI to the licensed material if it is supplied by the licensor now applies even where the material is used without modifications. We heard from many current and potential adopters that this requirement, which now mirrors Version 3.0, is important for provenance, branding, and other reasons. The requirement to indicate if you modify the material remains, but it is no longer tied to the URI requirement. We also added a requirement to retain an indication of prior modifications, so that important information about the source of a work (e.g., that a film is based on a novel) is retained. For inter-version compatibility purposes, we reverted to the Version 3.0 requirement to retain a notice about the disclaimer of warranties, but removed an obligation to retain a customized disclaimer (since those are no longer considered part of the license when offered, see LINK). One other substantive change is to make it clear that supplying the name of the author and attribution parties is only required if they are supplied by the licensor. We made a few other language and formatting changes to make the requirements as simple to understand as possible.

	}}		}}

CCID-shinchpearson at 23:12, 9 September 2013

2013-09-09T23:12:45Z

Show changes

SUNGHAN KIM: /* Attribution */

2013-06-15T05:45:49Z

Attribution

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:45, 15 June 2013
Line 51:		Line 51:
	== Attribution ==		== Attribution ==

	The current 3.0 licenses require users of a work to implement the following in any reasonable manner: ~~<ref>~~ See the [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Marking/Users#Marking_on_Your_Site Marking Page] for further information.~~</ref>~~		The current 3.0 licenses require users of a work to implement the following in any reasonable manner: See the [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Marking/Users#Marking_on_Your_Site Marking Page] for further information.

	* keep copyright notices intact; and		* keep copyright notices intact; and
	* reasonable to the medium or means used by the ~~licensee~~,		* reasonable to the medium or means used by the Certificate license,
	** ~~provide~~ the name the original author (or her ~~pseudonym~~, or other attribution party, when provided);		** providing the name is the original author's name (or her name, or other attribution party, when provided);
	** provide the title of the work if supplied;		** provide the title of the work if supplied;
	** include the URI associated with the work (if it refers to the copyright notice or licensing information); and		** include the URI associated with the work (if it refers to the copyright notice and licensing information); and
	** where an adaptation is created (when permitted by the license), include a credit stating that the work has been used in the adaptation <ref>Per Section 4(b) of the license, in the case of an adaptation or collection, where a credit for all contributing authors appears, the credit required must be at least as prominent as the credits for ~~other~~ contributing authors.</ref>		** where an adaptation is created (when permitted by the license), include a credit stating that the work has been used in the adaptation <ref>Per Section 4(b) of the license, in the case of an adaptation or collection, where a credit for all contributing authors appears, the credit required must be at least as prominent as the credits for contributing authors.</ref>

	All 3.0 licenses allow licensors to request removal of the credit when their works are reproduced in a collection, as well as when their works are adapted (where permitted by the licenses). Specifically, all six version 3.0 licenses provide: ~~<ref>~~See Section 4(a) of the licenses. ~~</ref>~~		All 3.0 licenses allow licensors to request removal of the credit when their works are reproduced in a collection, as well as when their works are adapted (where permitted by the licenses). Specifically, all six version 3.0 licenses provide: See Section 4(a) of the licenses.

	:: ''If You create a Collection, upon notice from any Licensor You must, to the extent practicable, remove from the Collection any credit as required by Section 4(__), as requested.''		:: ''If You create a Collection, upon notice from any Licensor You must, to the extent practicable, remove from the Collection any credit as required by Section 4(__), all requested.''

	:: And in ~~BY, BY-SA, BY-NC-SA, and~~ BY-NC, additionally:		:: And in BY-NC, additionally:

	:: ''If You create an Adaptation, upon notice from any Licensor You must, to the extent practicable, remove from the Adaptation any credit as required by Section 4(__), as requested.'' <ref>See Section 4(a) of the licenses that permit adaptations.</ref>		:: ''If You create an Adaptation, upon notice from any Licensor You must, to the extent practicable, remove from the Adaptation any credit as required by Section 4(__), as requested.'' <ref>See Section 4(a) of the licenses that permit adaptations.</ref>

Kat Walsh: update placeholder

2013-05-21T17:25:43Z

update placeholder

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:25, 21 May 2013
Line 45:		Line 45:
	Another change involves the requirement to retain notices of disclaimers or warranties. This requirement now extends only to customized notices of disclaimers or limitations on liability, or an affirmative undertaking of warranties by licensors. Our reasoning is that the license itself is abundantly clear on the non existence of a warranty, and that the requirement should be imposed only when the disclaimer or warranty has been modified in some respect, as 4.0 now makes possible.		Another change involves the requirement to retain notices of disclaimers or warranties. This requirement now extends only to customized notices of disclaimers or limitations on liability, or an affirmative undertaking of warranties by licensors. Our reasoning is that the license itself is abundantly clear on the non existence of a warranty, and that the requirement should be imposed only when the disclaimer or warranty has been modified in some respect, as 4.0 now makes possible.

	Last, we have consolidated and changed the requirements relating to modifications and the location of the original licensed material. Now, rather than indicating only where Adapted Material is created, licensees must indicate anytime they have modified the licensed material. (Not every modification results in the creation of an adaptation under copyright; some modifications are permitted even under the -ND licenses.) We want to be sure that whenever modifications are made, downstream licensees are aware of that and can get access to the unmodified original. We felt this change better served the interests of provenance and integrity of the original, but we seek further input on this and the other attribution and marking requirements during the public discussion period. }}		Last, we have consolidated and changed the requirements relating to modifications and the location of the original licensed material. Now, rather than indicating only where Adapted Material is created, licensees must indicate anytime they have modified the licensed material. (Not every modification results in the creation of an adaptation under copyright; some modifications are permitted even under the -ND licenses.) We want to be sure that whenever modifications are made, downstream licensees are aware of that and can get access to the unmodified original. We felt this change better served the interests of provenance and integrity of the original, but we seek further input on this and the other attribution and marking requirements during the public discussion period.
			====Draft 3 update====
			}}

	== Attribution ==		== Attribution ==

Kat Walsh: fmt

2013-05-20T19:09:14Z

fmt

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:09, 20 May 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	==Summary==		==Summary==
	<div style="padding: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px dotted red; background-color: #eee; width: 97%;">		<div style="padding: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px dotted red; background-color: #eee; width: 97%;">
	~~'''Page summary:'''~~ This page aggregates discussion topics involving attribution and marking requirements, as the two are closely related and have never been clearly or uniformly differentiated. Attribution has been a standard feature of all CC licenses since the [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/4216 version 2.0 suite]. Currently, attribution requirements are primarily contained in Section 4 of the 3.0 licenses. Marking requirements are interspersed throughout the license, including (in version 3.0) in Section 3(b), 4(a) and 4(b) of the licenses permitting adaptations, and in Section 4(a) of the two ND licenses (BY-ND and BY-NC-ND).		This page aggregates discussion topics involving attribution and marking requirements, as the two are closely related and have never been clearly or uniformly differentiated. Attribution has been a standard feature of all CC licenses since the [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/4216 version 2.0 suite]. Currently, attribution requirements are primarily contained in Section 4 of the 3.0 licenses. Marking requirements are interspersed throughout the license, including (in version 3.0) in Section 3(b), 4(a) and 4(b) of the licenses permitting adaptations, and in Section 4(a) of the two ND licenses (BY-ND and BY-NC-ND).
	</div>		</div>

Line 45:		Line 45:
	Another change involves the requirement to retain notices of disclaimers or warranties. This requirement now extends only to customized notices of disclaimers or limitations on liability, or an affirmative undertaking of warranties by licensors. Our reasoning is that the license itself is abundantly clear on the non existence of a warranty, and that the requirement should be imposed only when the disclaimer or warranty has been modified in some respect, as 4.0 now makes possible.		Another change involves the requirement to retain notices of disclaimers or warranties. This requirement now extends only to customized notices of disclaimers or limitations on liability, or an affirmative undertaking of warranties by licensors. Our reasoning is that the license itself is abundantly clear on the non existence of a warranty, and that the requirement should be imposed only when the disclaimer or warranty has been modified in some respect, as 4.0 now makes possible.

	Last, we have consolidated and changed the requirements relating to modifications and the location of the original licensed material. Now, rather than indicating only where Adapted Material is created, licensees must indicate anytime they have modified the licensed material. (Not every modification results in the creation of an adaptation under copyright; some modifications are permitted even under the -ND licenses.) We want to be sure that whenever modifications are made, downstream licensees are aware of that and can get access to the unmodified original. We felt this change better served the interests of provenance and integrity of the original, but we seek further input on this and the other attribution and marking requirements during the public discussion period.		Last, we have consolidated and changed the requirements relating to modifications and the location of the original licensed material. Now, rather than indicating only where Adapted Material is created, licensees must indicate anytime they have modified the licensed material. (Not every modification results in the creation of an adaptation under copyright; some modifications are permitted even under the -ND licenses.) We want to be sure that whenever modifications are made, downstream licensees are aware of that and can get access to the unmodified original. We felt this change better served the interests of provenance and integrity of the original, but we seek further input on this and the other attribution and marking requirements during the public discussion period. }}

	~~====Draft 3 update====~~


	}}

	== Attribution ==		== Attribution ==

Kat Walsh: fmt

2013-05-20T17:58:12Z

fmt

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:58, 20 May 2013
Line 37:		Line 37:
	\|}		\|}

			{{Infobox\|
	===Draft 3===		===Draft 3===
	~~{{Infobox\|'''Draft 3 treatment:'''~~

	This draft features only a few refinements to the attribution requirements as they appeared in 4.0d2. First, we have provided a bit more detail in connection with the requirement to identify the creator and other attribution parties. Licensees must do so in any manner reasonably requested by the licensor, including by pseudonym or trademark if designated. Note the shift in language away from “author” to the more inclusive term, “creator,” which is intended to better account for those licensing non-creative databases.		This draft features only a few refinements to the attribution requirements as they appeared in 4.0d2. First, we have provided a bit more detail in connection with the requirement to identify the creator and other attribution parties. Licensees must do so in any manner reasonably requested by the licensor, including by pseudonym or trademark if designated. Note the shift in language away from “author” to the more inclusive term, “creator,” which is intended to better account for those licensing non-creative databases.